Numbers can be deceiving

Media and newsmakers love to toss great big numbers, it seems to instill a sense of credibility where some perceive a lack. Thus 2012 is the year where many social media will reach important milestones:

- Facebook has over 850 million members and should reach one billion by this summer!

One Billion Members!!

- Twitter should reach the 500 million members mark by the end of February;

- LinkedIn had over 135 million members as of November 2011;

- Google+ is growing at speed-of-light pace, with an estimated 100 million members at end of January, and an estimated 400 million members by end of the year!

The fallacy behind these numbers is that having members doesn’t mean having active members. In fact, a recent report found that up to 36% of all accounts on Google+ are ghost accounts, meaning no photo, no bio and no registered activity. Another report found that only 25% of accounts opened on Twitter are actual real followers with up to 49% either fake or spam accounts. Not to mention all those accounts of loved ones who passed away, yet still have their Facebook page semi-active

Garbage in, Garbage out

Anyone remotely familiar with database marketing knows there is hardly anything unusual about this situation. Databases are living and breathing entities that require daily attention, cleaning up and analysis in order to provide value to all sizes of companies alike. Unfortunately, this is the un-sexy part of this marketing field, and too many brands delay before tending to it properly. I recall a couple of years ago, when I was in charge of the loyalty program in a big company, senior management was delighted with the fact we had close to 500,000 names in our database. Problem was, this database had not been cleaned up in its 10-years of existence. Thus, one could find:

- Customers who registered into the loyalty program but never experienced the service;

- Customers who registered into the loyalty program, tried the hotel, train or ski resort, then never came back again;

- Customer registered multiple times: J. Smith, John Smith, John Smithe, Mr Smith;

- Customers who passed away.

Any of this sounds familiar? Then, of course, were the names of people that were very similar, but with spelling mistakes or different email address, or physical address. So, if you are to keep names in the database, you must establish a threshold, say rolling back to 3 or 5 years, and delete all inactive names prior to that threshold, depending on the nature of your business, whether there are lots of repeat or not, etc. In the example above, the database ended up shrinking to a little over 230,000 names, of which some 120,000 had shown some form of engagement in the past 18 months. A sobering exercise compared to the initial 500,000 figure, but a more realistic number moving forward to adopt tactics accordingly.

So why does this matter?

It matters because not a day goes by when I don’t read a post, comment or question in chat rooms where people seek to get more fans, more followers, no matter what. Some brands will even pay to get fans on their Facebook page just to spike up their fan count. Not only does it not work, it actually becomes detrimental as it affects your Edge Rank score. On Twitter, some will follow just about anybody in the hope that just about anybody will follow them back in return.

Truth is, there are no shortcuts and there are no silver bullets!

Truth is, there are no shortcuts, and there are no silver bullets: in order to grow your fan base, followers and overall customer database, you will need to put in the effort to provide quality customer service first and foremost. Then, have a strategy that combines strategic ads with quality content online, engaging customers through social media, blog posts, newsletters and whitepapers.

Key take-away: Focus on the numbers that count for your business, and don’t lose sleep over how many fans you have on your Facebook page. Yes, quality and quantity go hand in hand, so long as you can validate that quantity as real customers, real fans or real followers. Not folks who joined just for a contest, never to come back again… :-)

Frederic Gonzalo

Senior marketing and communications expert & speaker with 18 years expertise in the travel and hospitality industry. Consulting since early 2012, I provide strategic planning, social media & mobile development counseling to small and medium businesses alike. Reach me at frederic@gonzomarketing.biz


Subscription to the blog

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.


6 comments
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Nick Rock
Nick Rock

I think you had the most important point in your bottom area: Customer Service IS the most important. Fans for brands are customers or at least potential customers. Treat your customers and fans in the right way and you will earn happy and engaging conversations and recommendations. Buying fans or followers doesn't work in no way. Facebook is finally smart enough with their edge rank to separate the good from the bad fanpage. Paid fans have close to zero engagement and won't help you.

Frederic Gonzalo
Frederic Gonzalo

Indeed Nick. Unfortunately, too many brands and companies seek the silver bullet and believe quantity can supersede quality, while both ought to go hand in hand. Cheers,

Gazalla
Gazalla

I couldn't agree more. At twitter, I have a bunch of friends that are using tools such as tweet adder to add more followers and I strongly believe that it's not the size of your follower count but the quality of your followers that are important. If you have 10,000 spammers and ghost followers you are not going to get the traffic or the rankings or whatever it is you want to achieve so it's better to have 10 quality followers than 10,000 spammers! I say quality over quantity any day.

Frederic Gonzalo
Frederic Gonzalo

Quality over quantity, yes. But I am sure you and I would agree that these two need not be mutually exclusive, and we should strive to achieve both... Thanks for your comment and insights, Gazalla!

Michele Price @prosperitygal
Michele Price @prosperitygal

One of the things I find interesting when monitoring a clients or competitors Facebook Page, what is their level of engagement? Monitoring Dell, I noticed they have a lousy 1.37% level of engagement. Now if Dell cannot afford to hire someone full time to handle their facebook fan page, then who can? Then I flipped over to my own and it was 30.67%. What kind of effect do you think it would have on dell's business if they actually took on engaging with their customers in social with a different perspective to how it affects their business and revenues? So, if you are going to determine Facebook is where your customers are and they are wanting to engage with you there, how does that play into your strategy and what biz objective does it align to?

Frederic Gonzalo
Frederic Gonzalo

Interesting comment, Michele. I guess it all depends on how you measure engagement. Facebook has its "People talking about this" indicator, as well as its "virality" component in the admnin analytics dashboard. I am surprised that Dell has such low engagement levels, per your analysis. And good for you for having such high engagement! This is certainly the biggest challenge for brands nowadays: not only having a presence in social media but actually engaging with customers, turning leads into sales and treating these platforms as a tremendous opportunity to change the nature of their business, rather than being a simple "marketing channel".